<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
  <titleInfo>
    <title>Civility</title>
  </titleInfo>
  <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
  <originInfo>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="text">Notre Dame, Ind</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <publisher>University of Notre Dame Press</publisher>
    <dateIssued>c2000</dateIssued>
    <issuance>monographic</issuance>
  </originInfo>
  <language>
    <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">eng</languageTerm>
  </language>
  <physicalDescription>
    <form authority="marcform">print</form>
    <extent>xvii, 252 p. ; 24 cm.</extent>
  </physicalDescription>
  <tableOfContents>Is civility a virtue? / James Schmidt --
Civic meetings, cultural meanings / Lawrence Cahoone --
Trust, confidence, and the problem of civility / Adam B. Seligman --
Beyond courtesy / Adam McClellan --
The belligerence of dogma / Stephen Toulmin --
The ethical status of civility / Robert B. Pippin --
Response to Robert B. Pippin / Daniel O. Dahlstrom --
Are we losing our virtue? / Alan Wolfe --
Response to Alan Wolfe / Lawrence Cahoone --
Civility and the limits to the tolerable / Edwin J. Delattre --
Civility in the family / Carrie Doehring --
On Confucian civility / Henry Rosemont Jr. --
Harmony, fragmentation, and democratic ritual / David B. Wong --
Sacred civilities / Ninian Smart --
Making peace / Virginia Straus.</tableOfContents>
  <tableOfContents>"Are Americans less civil than they used to be? If so, is that a bad thing? Perhaps we are just learning to be more honest. And what does civility mean? Is it just good manners? Or is civility a question of morality?" "In this lively conversation on an increasingly significant theme, major philosophers and religious scholars argue the issue on three levels. The first is manners: Henry Rosemont argues the Confucian case that manners are the substance of social relations, while Edwin Delattre and Adam Seligman believe that the issue is deeper than that; and the sociologist Alan Wolfe is persuaded that we are not less civil or ill-mannered than our predecessors. Secondly, as a social issue, James Schmidt, Lawrence Cahoone, and Adam Seligman turn to questions of structure and meaning in a civil society; Ninian Smart, David Wong, and Virginia Straus put the issue in a cross-cultural context; Stephen Toulmin describes the corruption of civility by dogmatism; and Carrier Doehring warns that civility may be a barrier to honest communication in family life. Finally, the metaphysical and religious dimensions of civility are explored by Robert Pippin, Adam McClellan, and Daniel Dahlstrom."--Jacket.</tableOfContents>
  <note type="statement of responsibility">edited by Leroy S. Rouner.</note>
  <subject>
    <topic>Civil society</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>Courtesy</topic>
  </subject>
  <classification authority="ddc">177.1 CIV</classification>
  <relatedItem type="series">
    <titleInfo>
      <title>Boston University studies in philosophy and religion ; v. 21</title>
    </titleInfo>
  </relatedItem>
  <identifier type="isbn">0268022550 (alk. paper)</identifier>
  <identifier type="isbn">0268022569 (pbk. : alk. paper)</identifier>
  <recordInfo>
    <recordContentSource authority="marcorg"/>
    <recordCreationDate encoding="marc">210224</recordCreationDate>
    <recordChangeDate encoding="iso8601">20241126110651.0</recordChangeDate>
  </recordInfo>
</mods>
